Dustin Chambers
-
Senior Affiliated ScholarProfessor of Economics, Salisbury University
Dustin Chambers is a Professor of Economics in the Perdue School of Business at Salisbury University and a Senior Affiliated Scholar with the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Dr. Chambers is an applied econometrician who has published widely on the topics of income inequality, poverty, and economic growth. His most recent research focuses on the regressive effects of government regulations, including their unintended impact on consumer prices, entrepreneurship, and social mobility vis-a-vis income inequality and poverty. He earned his MA in economics from UCLA and his PhD in economics from the University of California at Riverside.
Latest Work
- | Feature Feature
California’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Arizona’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Alaska’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Connecticut’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Colorado’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Delaware’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Illinois’ Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Florida’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Georgia’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Hawaii’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
Latest Work
- | Feature Feature
Connecticut’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
California’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Colorado’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Delaware’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Arizona’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Alaska’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Massachusetts’ Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Mississippi’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Minnesota’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Louisiana’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
Latest Work
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
Snapshots of State Regulations | 2024 Edition
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
POLICY SPOTLIGHT | Tackling the Human Cost of Regulations
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Human Cost of Regulations and Some Possible Solutions
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Working Papers Working Papers
RegAuthorities: The Regulations Authorities Dataset
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulation | 2022 Edition
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Alabama
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Arizona
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in California
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Colorado
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Connecticut
Latest Work
- | Mercatus Original Video Mercatus Original Video
Regressive Effects of Regulation: How to Cut Red Tape
Latest Work
- | Regulation Regulation
- | State Testimonies State Testimonies
Regulatory Reform and Cutting the Red Tape in Pennsylvania
- | Regulation Regulation
- | State Testimonies State Testimonies
Texas State Agency Review
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Federal Testimonies Federal Testimonies
The Regressive Effects of Federal Regulation and a Roadmap for Reform
Testimony before Senate Subcommittee on Regulatory Affairs and Federal Management
Latest Work
- | Feature Feature
Connecticut’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
California’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Colorado’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Delaware’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Arizona’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Alaska’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Massachusetts’ Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Mississippi’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Minnesota’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Louisiana’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences