- | Academic & Student Programs Academic & Student Programs
- | Journal Articles Journal Articles
- |
In Reply To Sweatshop Sophistries
Originally published in Human Rights Quarterly
This article first demonstrates that wages and working conditions are interrelated and that economists are correct to analyze them together. It then examines the four economic mechanisms which Arnold and Hartman (2006) suggested could overturn the traditional economic view that raising wages in sweatshops would unemploy workers. Finally cautions are given against suggested reforms such as industry wide ethical standards and adherence to local labor laws because these reforms would negatively impact workers' welfare.

This article first demonstrates that wages and working conditions are interrelated and that economists are correct to analyze them together. It then examines the four economic mechanisms which Arnold and Hartman (2006) suggested could overturn the traditional economic view that raising wages in sweatshops would unemploy workers. It is shown that their mechanisms fail to achieve their purpose. Finally cautions are given against suggested reforms such as industry wide ethical standards and adherence to local labor laws because these reforms would negatively impact workers' welfare.
Find the article at Project Muse.
To speak with a scholar or learn more on this topic, visit our contact page.