A Dilemma for Saulish Skepticism
Either Self-Defeating or Not Even Skepticism
Originally published in Disputatio
Jennifer Saul argues that the evidence from the literature on implicit biases entails a form of skepticism. In this paper, I argue that Saul faces a dilemma: her argument is either self-defeating, or it does not yield a skeptical conclusion. For Saul, both results are unacceptable; thus, her argument fails.