James Buchanan and Contractarian Anarchy

Originally published in The Journal of Prices and Markets

This paper traces the normative side of James Buchanan’s individualist-subjectivist-contractarian position.

This paper traces the normative side of James Buchanan’s individualist-subjectivist-contractarian position.  The literature on anarchy and radical self-governance treats Buchanan’s position, and social contract theory more generally, as a rival rather than allied branch of analysis.  However, I argue that Buchanan’s normative position, if taken to its logical conclusion, yields conclusions commensurate with anarchy.  Buchanan’s theory of individual sovereignty suggests that political action is justified only to the extent that it adheres to a social contract that meets the requirements of conceptual unanimity.  It also suggests individuals have the right to secede from communities they feel no longer adhere to the social contract.  These beliefs form the foundation of a social contract theory deserving the label “anarchic.”

Find the article online at SSRN.

To speak with a scholar or learn more on this topic, visit our contact page.

Mercatus AI Assistant
Ask questions about this research.
GPT Logo
Mercatus AI Research Assistant
Ask questions about this research. Mercatus Chatbot AI More Details
Suggested Prompts:
Ask us anything. We use OpenAI's ChatGPT 4o base model to answer any question about Mercatus research.