Diane Katz

Diane Katz is a senior research fellow in regulatory policy for the Heritage Foundation. Before joining Heritage in 2010, she served as director of risk, environment, and energy policy at the Fraser Institute. From 2002 to 2008, she was director of science, environment, and technology for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Katz’s analyses and commentary have been published by Wall Street Journal, Washington Times, National Review, Weekly Standard, and Reason in addition to dozens of regional and local newspapers and blogs. She has testified before Congress and several state legislatures.
Publications & Appearances
- | International Freedom and Trade International Freedom and Trade
- | Expert Commentary Expert Commentary
The Export-Import Bank Doesn't Make America Great
The Trump administration is attempting to revive the Export-Import Bank's capacity to finance deals over ten million dollars…
- | Corporate Welfare Corporate Welfare
- | Expert Commentary Expert Commentary
Don't Buy the Pro-Ex-Im Hype
Media outlets big and small readily accepted the recent claim by Boeing officials that hundreds of impending layoffs in Southern…
- | Corporate Welfare Corporate Welfare
- | Data Visualizations Data Visualizations
The Export-Import Bank’s Small Business Program Supports Big Companies
Among its four principal financial products, the Export-Import Bank has provided “working capital” loans and loan guarantees that assure repayment to private lenders in the event a borrower defaults. According to bank officials, this form of subsidized financing “primarily” benefits small business. In a July 16 letter to Sen. Marco Rubio and others, Ex-Im president Fred Hochberg characterized the bank’s working capital financing as “issued to mostly small businesses.”

- | Corporate Welfare Corporate Welfare
- | Data Visualizations Data Visualizations
Export Jobs Won’t Disappear Absent Ex-Im Bank
The charter of the US Export-Import Bank is set to expire on June 30 unless it is reauthorized by Congress. Scare tactics aside, the end of Ex-Im would not mean the loss of thousands of American jobs. Economists have long understood that subsidies doled out by government credit agencies such as the Ex-Im Bank are not merely unnecessary: they can actually harm the economy. In their quest to keep the subsidies flowing, proponents of the bank are claiming that failure to reauthorize its charter would lead to massive job losses. This blatant fearmongering has succeeded in causing concern among some lawmakers.

- | Corporate Welfare Corporate Welfare
- | Expert Commentary Expert Commentary
Why Letting Ex-Im Bank’s Charter Expire Won’t Lead to Massive Job Losses
The charter of the Export-Import Bank is set to expire on June 30 unless it is reauthorized by Congress. Scare tactics of bank…
- | Corporate Welfare Corporate Welfare
- | Research Papers Research Papers
The Export-Import Bank’s Top Foreign Buyers
Ex-Im Bank advocates emphasize its importance to small businesses and economic growth. A new analysis of government data reveals that Ex-Im Bank’s top 10 overseas buyers are large corporations that primarily purchase exports from multinational conglomerates. Ex-Im Bank’s small business narrative is challenged by the fact that the buyers receiving the most subsidies are—like the exporters—major corporations.